O
@omarbyte7
Jul 21, 2025
Reliable and fast
GPT-4 is fast and accurate for most of what I throw at it. Brainstorming, refactoring, summarizing dense docs — it just works. Highly recommend.
← Back to catalog★★★★★★★★★★ ★★★★★★★★★★ ★★★★★★★★★★ ★★★★★★★★★★ ★★★★★★★★★★ ★★★★★★★★★★ ★★★★★★★★★★ ★★★★★★★★★★ ★★★★★★★★★★ ★★★★★★★★★★
G
Rating breakdown
5★
105
4★
99
3★
15
2★
1
1★
0
Reviews (220)
C
@chloe252
Jul 20, 2025
Genuinely impressive
For research and long-form writing GPT-4 is excellent. Context handling is strong and the answers feel thought-through, not generic. Would recommend to a colleague.
M
@makes_wes118
Jul 19, 2025
Great for coding and drafting
For research and long-form writing GPT-4 is excellent. Context handling is strong and the answers feel thought-through, not generic.
O
@omar845
Jul 17, 2025
Best model I've used for work
For research and long-form writing GPT-4 is excellent. Context handling is strong and the answers feel thought-through, not generic. Would recommend to a colleague.
J
@jamie653
Jul 16, 2025
My daily driver for writing
GPT-4 has become part of my daily workflow. The reasoning is sharp, the writing is clean, and it rarely loses the thread on long prompts. Worth every penny.
I
@isabella330
Jul 10, 2025
Reliable and fast
GPT-4 is fast and accurate for most of what I throw at it. Brainstorming, refactoring, summarizing dense docs — it just works. Would recommend to a colleague.
I
@ivylabs39
Jul 9, 2025
My daily driver for writing
Switched to GPT-4 a few months ago and haven't looked back. Code suggestions are solid and it explains its reasoning clearly. Would recommend to a colleague.
Z
@zoe_thinks
Jul 8, 2025
Best model I've used for work
For research and long-form writing GPT-4 is excellent. Context handling is strong and the answers feel thought-through, not generic. Worth every penny.
R
@raj260
Jul 6, 2025
Reliable and fast
Switched to GPT-4 a few months ago and haven't looked back. Code suggestions are solid and it explains its reasoning clearly. Would recommend to a colleague.
N
@ninapixel77
Jul 4, 2025
Solid with caveats
It's a useful assistant. The rate limits and occasional refusals are annoying, but the core quality is there. Your mileage may vary.